I felt it was obvious to anyone who follows this topic, and thread, that a party line vote is what shoveled in the "Net Neutrality" system, and it was apt that it was a party line vote, that restored normality to the internet system.
Large players, usually incorporated interests, with shareholders, employees, and customers, will naturally have a outsized interest in public policy such as was the 2015 imposition in this case. It makes sense that those with skin in the game would be pleased with the temporary regulations now voided.
Is regulation necessary in general when businesses large and small are doing commerce, YES, and regulation exists, with the FCC being the enforcer, as was noted in several articles quoted here regarding this issue. Any number of items were listed, where voluntary agreement was reached, offered and accepted, by Comcast is one cited, and such agreement makes lots of sense where needed.
The broad brush approach is not necessary, not at this time anyway, and fear of change demonstrated by those who quote all manner of ills that will befall us with the change to the way we handled this area of commerce from its start until 2015, is overstated, here and in general.
Someone felt so strongly as to place terrorist threats to try and block the FCC meeting this week... wtf? Where issues must be decided, agreements made, I am certain such agreements will be made, with the people we pay to handle liberty of thought, when the need may arise.
Seems an endless array of 'Regulations' is available to be culled, removed, or adjusted... duplication removed at very least... and freedom restored for all Americans to grow and prosper from their risk taking ventures.