As I stated above, the U.S. Supreme Court plays no role in the passage and ratification of a Constitutional Amendment.
They have the options of reviewing, the Wording of the
proposed Amendment for Constitutionality. This can delay the proceedings, as many times as they want, but you're right. They can't overturn it until it becomes Law.
On top of that, the U.S. president plays no role in the passage and ratification of a Constitutional Amendment.
No, but only the States vote on the Ratification. The president can Veto the Proposed Amendment.
Here's your argument: It takes only two bodies -- the House and Senate -- to impeach and convict a president, yet it takes three bodies -- the House, Senate, and the States -- to ratify a Constitutional Amendment.
No, that part of my argument was that 202 years>8. 2 centuries>a decade, by 2 Orders of Magnitude. (Give and take 2 years.) Also, there's no Term Limits for Congress, so they can take decades to go through the entire process of writing, and passing an Amendment (To be ratified by the States.)
Also, it's not 2>3, it's 50 states, 100 Senators, and at the moment, 435 Representatives. We need an Majority in the Senate, then the House, and Then the States (With options to veto, or edit the wording in there by the other 2 branches.) So, while you're checking my straw-lawyer's math, it's 3
Stages of ratification, which Multiplies the probability, not a tribunal voting.
If we had a tribunal, than 2 votes for outweighs 1 vote against. Which is what you boiled my argument down to. You're choosing to look at a Quadratic Equation of probability as a simple "2+1=3." as your counter-argument.
If you want my entire argument, in a nutshell, it's: "This is a lot more complicated than that," and the more details we both collectively discuss, the more of that complexity you help me detail.
Your move. Start with all the times a Bill of Rights (The first 10) Amendment has been overturned, by anyone.